Overblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
23 juillet 2019 2 23 /07 /juillet /2019 16:18
For Immediate Release

Independent Jewish Voices Canada slams continued Government inaction on racist charity

July 19, 2019

VANCOUVER – Independent Jewish Voices Canada (IJV) is outraged by the federal government’s refusal to respond substantively to irrefutable evidence of violations of the Income Tax Act by a registered Canadian charity.

Yesterday, the government issued its official response to IJV’s formal, legal Parliamentary e-petition, signed by over 3,500 Canadians, calling on the Jewish National Fund of Canada’s (JNF Canada) charitable status to be revoked due to their numerous, grave, persistent violations of the Income Tax Act. The government’s response was simply a reiteration of the same response IJV and other concerned parties have been receiving from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) for decades — that the auditing process is confidential, and that the CRA ensures that registered charities are held accountable for violations of the Income Tax Act accordingly.

“My village is one of three villages that were depopulated in 1967, and with the aid of the JNF, illegally demolished by Israeli forces," said Dr. Ismail Zayid of Halifax, a signatory to the comprehensive complaint to the CRA which formed the basis of IJV’s e-petition. "Today, lands belonging to my hometown of Beit Nuba, along with the villages of Yalu and Imwas, are covered over by JNF Canada’s flagship project, ‘Canada Park’."

“For over four decades, defenders of the human rights of Palestinians have been petitioning the CRA to revoke JNF Canada’s charitable status for its appalling discrimination against Palestinians,” said Rabbi David Mivasair, IJV spokesperson, and another signatory to the comprehensive complaint against JNF Canada’s serial violations of the Income Tax Act. “Canadians who see that the CRA refuses to do its job, which, based on the evidence, requires it to revoke JNF Canada’s charitable status, have serious concerns about government bias in favour of certain groups and against others.”

“By failing to apply Canadian tax law to JNF Canada’s support for the Israeli military, entrenchment of Israel’s illegal activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, projects that take Palestinian land and exclude them from it, and other egregious activities,” continued Mivasair, “the Canadian government is sending a clear message: it doesn’t regard Palestinian lives as worthy. This is beyond shameful, and shows a disturbing pattern of systemic racism against Palestinians by this government.”

“IJV is discussing the government’s response with our legal support team, and will consider next steps to ensure that Canada's tax law is upheld and JNF Canada is held accountable for its actions. If the CRA refuses to uphold Canadian law in light of substantial and irrefutable evidence, how can Canadians be assured that the law of the land is being respected?” concluded Mivasair.

For media inquiries contact: Judith Muster, IJV Acting National Coordinator, judithm@ijvcanada.org, (647) 570-3924

 


Join or Donate to IJV!

Follow us on Twitter

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Instagram

Partager cet article
Repost0
23 juillet 2019 2 23 /07 /juillet /2019 15:47
Ottawa stands by U.S. as safe third country, despite new border policy
Ottawa stands by U.S. as safe third country, despite new border policy
Brennan MacDonald , Vassy Kapelos · CBC News · Posted: Jul 18, 2019 6:16 PM ET | Last Updated: July 18July 17, 2019
 

The federal government says it stands by its designation of the U.S. as a safe third country despite domestic and international calls to suspend a border pact with Washington in the wake of controversial asylum policy changes implemented by the Trump administration.

"The United States remains a country governed by the rule of law, and by the branches of the executive, legislative and judiciary, while also subscribing to international conventions on refugees and on torture," said Marie-Emmanuelle Cadieux, press secretary for Minister of Border Security Bill Blair.

"The Safe Third Country Agreement between Canada and the U.S. is not affected by these changes," said Cadieux.

On Wednesday, Amnesty International called on Canada to immediately suspend the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA), saying a new U.S. policy for its southern border does not adequately guarantee the rights of those seeking asylum.

The policy, implemented Tuesday, deems any person who enters the U.S. across its southern border ineligible for asylum if they failed to apply for protection in a third country through which they transited en route to the U.S.

There is no single basis upon which the STCA can... be defended.— Justin Mohammed, Amnesty International

The policy effectively prohibits most Central American migrants from asylum protections.

"With the implementation of this policy, there is no single basis upon which the STCA can, in any way, be defended," said Justin Mohammed, Amnesty International Canada's human rights law and policy campaigner.

"The operation of the STCA would prevent those very same claimants from obtaining protection in Canada and therefore must be suspended, or otherwise risk complicity in U.S. violations of international refugee and human rights law," said Mohammed.

The United Nations' refugee agency said Monday that the new U.S. policy jeopardizes asylum protections and is out of step with international obligations.

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees "believes the rule excessively curtails the right to apply for asylum, jeopardizes the right to protection from refoulement, significantly raises the burden of proof on asylum seekers beyond the international legal standard, sharply curtails basic rights and freedoms of those who manage to meet it, and is not in line with international obligations," according to a statement released Monday.

 

Violation of agreements

Under the STCA, refugee claimants are required to request refugee protection in the first safe country they arrive in — meaning Canadian border officials would send back to the U.S. any would-be refugee claimants arriving at an official border crossing to Canada.

Audrey Macklin, professor and chair in human rights law at the University of Toronto, says Canada should suspend the STCA in the wake of the new U.S. policy changes.

"The UNHCR has said ... the United States is not in line with international obligations — that's a way of saying it's not safe," said Macklin in an interview with CBC News Network's Power & Politics.

"The United States has adopted a law that allows it to send people back to countries where they may face a well-founded fear of persecution with no chance to make up their refugee claim," Macklin told host Vassy Kapelos.

 

"If Canada sends people back to persecution it's in violation of the [UN] Refugee Convention. If Canada sends people to a country that it knows will send people back to face persecution, it also violates its international obligations," added Macklin.

Asked if that would put Canada out of line with its international obligations, the UNHCR's representative to Canada, Jean-Nicolas Beuze, said he wasn't in a position to comment because the agency is still reviewing the legal aspects of the implications for a person showing up at the Canadian border.

Cadieux, Bill Blair's press secretary, said the minister spoke with the UNHCR representative to Canada about the agency's concerns.

Blair's office said Canada will continue to monitor conditions to ensure the U.S. continues to meet the requirements for safe third country designation.

The new U.S. policy is expected to face a legal challenge.

Partager cet article
Repost0
23 juillet 2019 2 23 /07 /juillet /2019 15:20
‘Climate apartheid’: UN expert says human rights may not survive
‘Climate apartheid’: UN expert says human rights may not survive
Damian Carrington Environment editorJune 24, 2019

The world is increasingly at risk of “climate apartheid”, where the rich pay to escape heat and hunger caused by the escalating climate crisis while the rest of the world suffers, a report from a UN human rights expert has said.

Philip Alston, UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, said the impacts of global heating are likely to undermine not only basic rights to life, water, food, and housing for hundreds of millions of people, but also democracy and the rule of law.

Alston is critical of the “patently inadequate” steps taken by the UN itself, countries, NGOs and businesses, saying they are “entirely disproportionate to the urgency and magnitude of the threat”. His report to the UN human rights council (HRC) concludes: “Human rights might not survive the coming upheaval.”

The report also condemns Donald Trump for “actively silencing” climate science, and criticises the Brazilian president, Jair Bolsonaro, for promising to open up the Amazon rainforest to mining. But Alston said there were also some positive developments, including legal cases against states and fossil fuel companies, the activism of Greta Thunberg and the worldwide school strikes, and Extinction Rebellion.

In May, Alston’s report on poverty in the UK compared Conservative party welfare policies to the creation of 19th-century workhouses. Ministers said his report gave a completely inaccurate picture, but Alston accused them of “total denial of a set of uncontested facts”.

Alston’s report on climate change and poverty will be formally presented to the HRC in Geneva on Friday. It said the greatest impact of the climate crisis would be on those living in poverty, with many losing access to adequate food and water.

“Climate change threatens to undo the last 50 years of progress in development, global health, and poverty reduction,” Alston said. Developing countries will bear an estimated 75% of the costs of the climate crisis, the report said, despite the poorest half of the world’s population causing just 10% of carbon dioxide emissions.

“Yet democracy and the rule of law, as well as a wide range of civil and political rights are every bit at risk,” Alston’s report said. “The risk of community discontent, of growing inequality, and of even greater levels of deprivation among some groups, will likely stimulate nationalist, xenophobic, racist and other responses. Maintaining a balanced approach to civil and political rights will be extremely complex.”

The impacts of the climate crisis could increase divisions, Alston said. “We risk a ‘climate apartheid’ scenario where the wealthy pay to escape overheating, hunger, and conflict while the rest of the world is left to suffer,” he said.

“When Hurricane Sandy wreaked havoc on New York in 2012, stranding low-income and vulnerable New Yorkers without access to power and healthcare, the Goldman Sachs headquarters was protected by tens of thousands of its own sandbags and power from its generator.”

Alston strongly criticises all those working to uphold human rights, including his own previous work, for not making the climate crisis a central issue. He said the most recent HRC resolution on the climate crisis did not recognise “that the enjoyment of all human rights by vast numbers of people is gravely threatened” or “the need for the deep social and economic transformation, which almost all observers agree is urgent if climate catastrophe is to be averted”.

International climate treaties have been ineffective, the report said, with even the 2015 Paris accord still leaving the world on course for a catastrophic 3C (equivalent to an increase of 5.4F) of heating without further action. “States have marched past every scientific warning and threshold, and what was once considered catastrophic warming now seems like a best-case scenario,” the report said.

The US president is one of the few individuals named in the report. “He has placed former lobbyists in oversight roles, adopted industry talking points, presided over an aggressive rollback of environmental regulations, and is actively silencing and obfuscating climate science.”

However, the required changes to societies and economies could be an opportunity to improve poor people’s lives, Alston said. “This crisis should be a catalyst for states to fulfil long ignored economic and social rights, including to social security and access to food, healthcare, shelter, and decent work,” the report said.

Ashfaq Khalfan at Amnesty International said: “Climate change is a human rights issue precisely because of the impact it’s having on people. The primary obligation to protect people from human rights harms lies with states. A state that fails to take any feasible steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is violating their human rights obligations.”

He said Amnesty planned to target governments and fossil fuel companies. “We need everybody to live up to their responsibilities to act on climate change and protect human rights,” he said.

Partager cet article
Repost0
23 juillet 2019 2 23 /07 /juillet /2019 15:17
Trump administration to expand quick deportations anywhere in U.S.
Trump administration to expand quick deportations anywhere in U.S.
July 21, 2019

Guatemalan immigrants are searched at an airport in Mesa, Ariz., before being deported to Guatemala City in 2011.

(John Moore / Getty Images)

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers will be able to more quickly arrest and deport undocumented immigrants anywhere in the United States without going before an immigration judge under a new policy released by the Trump administration Monday.

The move aggressively expands a process known as “expedited removal” — quick deportations that generally aren’t subject to judicial review. The expanded process is set to take effect Tuesday.

Under current policy, immigration officials can apply expedited removals to speed deportations of people apprehended within 100 miles of the border and for those who’ve been in the country up to two weeks. Those who arrived in the U.S. by sea, rather than at U.S. land borders, can be subject to expedited removal for up to two years.

Under the new policy, officials will be empowered to use the fast-track procedures anywhere in the U.S. and for anyone who cannot show “to the satisfaction of an immigration officer, that they have been physically present in the United States continuously for the two-year period immediately preceding” arrest, regardless of how they arrived, according to the notice published Monday.

The new deportation policy is the second major effort by the administration this month to aggressively expand its power to try to keep migrants out of the U.S. or remove them if they enter. Last week, the administration moved to curb asylum in the U.S. That rule effectively eliminated almost all asylum claims at the U.S. southern land border by rendering ineligible any asylum seeker who’d transited at least one other country prior to arriving.

The move to expand expedited removals comes as backlogs in immigration courts continue to grow. Nearly 950,000 cases are currently pending in U.S. immigration courts, with an average wait time of 713 days, or just under two years, according to Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.

President Trump and his hardline anti-immigration aides have been frustrated that despite concerted efforts to step up enforcement and crackdown immigration, they’ve largely been unable to reverse a surge in migration to the U.S. southern border and the ballooning backlog in immigration cases.

Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU’s national Immigrants’ Rights Project, said the expanded expedited removals increases the concern advocates already had that the quick deportations have been violating immigrants’ rights to due process.

Advertisement

“The expedited removal system is already unconstitutional in our view,” Gelernt said. “This expansion will only increase the illegality.”

Partager cet article
Repost0
23 juillet 2019 2 23 /07 /juillet /2019 14:42
SIGN ON: Solidarity with Wayfair workers! Worker power can shut down the concentration camps!
Solidarity with Wayfair workers in their struggle to end profiteering from im/migrant suffering!

Worker power can bring an end to the concentration camps!
 
Partager cet article
Repost0
23 juillet 2019 2 23 /07 /juillet /2019 14:38
{PAJU1} PAJU (Palestinian and Jewish Unity) # 962 July 19th, 2019: Canada joins campaign to stifle criticism of Israel
(le français suit) PAJU (Palestinian and Jewish Unity) # 962 July 19th, 2019

Canada joins campaign to stifle criticism of Israel

 

by John Clarke

On June 25, Canada’s Minister of Canadian Heritage and Multiculturalism announced that the Trudeau government’s new anti-racism strategy would include the adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism. The Co-Chair of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) proudly noted that

"the IHRA definition also explicitly recognizes that anti-Zionism – that is the delegitimization and demonization of the Jewish state – is a clear and unequivocal expression of anti-Semitism."

While the adoption of this definition is as yet only ‘symbolic and declaratory,’ it can form the basis for attacks on Palestinian solidarity at various levels. The funding of NGOs that are critical of Israel may be threatened. Public institutions will be pressured to deny meeting facilities for events that take the Palestinian side. It is also quite possible that this initiative could be taken further and the expression of anti-Zionist views actually be treated as a form of hate crime.

Misuse of Anti-Semitism

This latest move is part of the Canadian component of a concerted international drive to weaponize the false allegation of anti-Semitism in the service of Israel. In 2009, the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) was formed, comprised of former and sitting MPs from each party. It issued its report in 2011 and the focus was on combating the so called ‘new anti-Semitism’ of those who challenge Israel. Independent Jewish Voices (Canada) described the whole initiative as an ‘attempt to attack free speech and silence criticism of the Israeli government’s oppressive and illegal policies’ and ‘to label criticism of Israel and its behaviour, as well as organized efforts to change them, as anti-Semitic and to criminalize both.’

Independent Jewish Voices (Canada) has produced an excellent report that shows how the IHRA definition is being used to further the attack on Palestinian solidarity, insufficient attention is paid to very real forms of anti-Semitic hate crime. The Israeli government and its supporters are aggressively using this document as a key tool in their efforts to ‘suppress – and even criminalize – criticism of Israel and support for Palestinian rights.’

If the effort to intimidate and suppress support for the Palestinians, especially when it is expressed as clear and forthright anti-Zionism, is being challenged with such escalating ferocity, this largely reflects a certain note of desperation on the part of Israel’s apologists. The BDS Movement has made gains and the general mood has shifted against the Zionist state. At the same time, Israel’s political leadership is racing to the right with the support of the Trump Administration and dispensing with polite fictions about a peace process, as they move tobrutally complete the colonial project. The pretence of a liberal democracy seeking a just resolution is no longer viable.

The accusation of anti-Semitism against international supporters of a free Palestine is really all that’s left in the toolbox. So, while fascists in Eastern Europe pose a real threat to Jewish communities and US Nazis march through the streets chanting, ‘Jews will not replace us,’ fire is focused on the left and life-long anti-racists, like Jeremy Corbyn, are labelled as hatemongers. Moreover, the goal of the attack is no longer merely character assassination. The IHRA definition is being put forward as one that should inform the work of police and prosecutors. They prepare the ground to arrest those they can’t intimidate into silence.

Though he was not the first Zionist politician to make this gesture, Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, stood before the Security Council in April of this year and waved a bible in his hand as he declared that “this is our deed to our land.” That anyone can suggest that an ancient religious text should be used to decide affairs of state and international relations in the 21st Century is quite astounding yet no Western leader would even consider questioning these theatrics. If, however, Danon’s bible promised, not a part of the Middle East, but a portion of Western Europe, the Zionist claim to self-determination would have gone nowhere. When Zionism emerged in the 19th Century, as an adjunct of European colonialism, no one spoke in code. Everyone understood that the plan was for a settler colony that would serve as a garrison of Western interests. It would be, as Theodor Herzl put it,

"a sector of the wall of Europe against Asia, we shall serve as the outpost of civilization against barbarism."

Herzl’s wall is standing today. It was erected by ethnically cleansing the bulk of the Palestinian population, creating vast numbers of refugees and establishing an Apartheid regime for those who could not be removed.

The nature and role of the State of Israel is such that we can’t be content to be critical of its excesses and worst aspects. The seventh of the ‘contemporary examples of anti-Semitism’ listed in the IHRA definition speaks of ‘Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.’ The dispossession of the Palestinians can’t possibly be considered the exercise of a right to self-determination and Israel, a colonial settler state, is a fundamentally racist endeavour. Zionism is not a religion or an ethnicity but a political ideology and its propositions are questioned or rejected by many Jews, while they are supported by leaders of Western powers who are, for the most part, not Jewish.

Adapted from: https://www.counterfire.org/news/20414-canada-joins-campaign-to-stifle-criticism-of-israel

Distributed by PAJU (Palestinian and Jewish Unity)

 

HTTPS://PAJUMONTREAL.ORG.EN

 

================================================================================================================

PAJU (Palestiniens et Juifs Unis) No 962 le 19 juillet 2019

Le Canada se joint à la campagne visant à étouffer les critiques à l'égard d'Israël

par John Clarke

Le 25 juin, la ministre du Patrimoine canadien et du Multiculturalisme a annoncé que la nouvelle stratégie antiraciste du gouvernement Trudeau inclurait l’adoption de la définition de l’antisémitisme de la International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). Le coprésident du Centre pour les affaires israéliennes et juives (CIJA) a noté avec fierté que

« La définition de l'IHRA reconnaît également explicitement que l'antisionisme - c'est-à-dire la délégitimation et la diabolisation de l'État juif - est une expression claire et sans équivoque de l'antisémitisme ».

 

Si l’adoption de cette définition n’est pour l’instant que « symbolique et déclaratoire », elle peut constituer la base d’attaques contre la solidarité palestinienne à différents niveaux. Le financement d'ONG critiques à l'égard d'Israël peut être menacé. Des pressions seront exercées sur les institutions publiques pour qu’elles interdisent l’organisation de réunions pour les événements qui ont lieu du côté palestinien. Il est également fort possible que cette initiative soit poursuivie et que l'expression de vues antisionistes soit en réalité traitée comme une forme de crime motivé par la haine.

 

Usage malhonnête de la définition de l’antisémitisme

 

Ce dernier mouvement fait partie de la campagne internationale concertée pour fabriquer des armes contre toute fausse allégation d’antisémitisme au service d’Israël. En 2009, la Coalition parlementaire canadienne de lutte contre l'antisémitisme (CPCCA) a été formée. Elle fut composée d'anciens députés et de députés en exercice de chaque parti. Elle a publié son rapport en 2011 et s'est concentrée sur la lutte contre le prétendu « nouvel antisémitisme » de ceux qui défient Israël.

 

Voix Juives Indépendantes (Canada) a décrit l’initiative comme étant une « attaque contre la liberté d'expression et une tentative de réduire au silence les critiques des politiques oppressives et illégales du gouvernement israélien », et d’« étiqueter la critique du comportement d’Israël, aussi bien que les efforts bien organisés de changer ce comportement , comme étant antisémites, et en criminalisant les deux. »

 

Voix Juives Indépendantes (Canada) a produit un excellent rapport qui montre comment la définition de l'IHRA est utilisée pour renforcer l'attaque contre la solidarité palestinienne. Une attention insuffisante est accordée aux formes très réelles de crimes de haine antisémites. Le gouvernement israélien et ses partisans utilisent ce document de manière agressive comme outil essentiel dans leurs efforts pour « supprimer - voire criminaliser » la critique d’Israël et le soutien aux droits des Palestiniens.

 

Si les efforts visant à intimider et à supprimer le soutien aux Palestiniens, en particulier s’il s’agit d’un antisionisme clair et franc, sont mis à l’épreuve avec une telle férocité, c’est qu’ils reflètent en grande partie le désespoir des apologistes israéliens. Le mouvement BDS a réalisé des progrès et l’ambiance générale s’est déplacée contre l’État sioniste. Au même moment, les dirigeants politiques israéliens s’orientent de plus en plus vers la droite avec le soutien de l’administration Trump et l’abandon de fictions polies sur un processus de paix, alors qu’ils s’apprêtent à achever brutalement le projet colonial. Le prétexte d'une démocratie libérale à la recherche d'une résolution juste n'est plus viable.

 

L’accusation d’antisémitisme contre les partisans internationaux d’une Palestine libre est vraiment tout ce qui leur reste dans leur boîte à outils. Ainsi, alors que les fascistes d’Europe de l’Est représentent une menace réelle pour les communautés juives et que les nazis américains défilent dans les rues en scandant, les Juifs ne nous remplaceront pas, les tirs sont concentrés sur la gauche et des antiracistes à vie, comme Jeremy Corbyn, étiquetés comme des contrebandiers. De plus, le but de leur attaque n'est plus simplement un assassinat de caractère. La définition de l'IHRA est en train d'être présentée comme une base qui devrait informer le travail de la police et des procureurs. Ils préparent le terrain pour arrêter ceux qu’ils ne peuvent pas intimider au silence.

 

Bien qu’il n’ait pas été le premier homme politique sioniste à faire ce geste, l’ambassadeur d’Israël auprès de l’ONU, Danny Danon, a comparu devant le Conseil de sécurité en avril de cette année et a brandi une bible en déclarant que « c’est notre acte envers la possession de notre terre. » Que quiconque puisse suggérer qu’un ancien texte religieux soit utilisé pour décider des affaires d’État et des relations internationales au XXIe siècle est tout à fait stupéfiant, pourtant aucun dirigeant occidental n’envisagerait même de remettre en question ces théâtraux. Si toutefois la bible de Danon avait promis, non pas au Moyen-Orient, mais à l’Europe occidentale, la revendication sioniste de l’autodétermination ne serait allée nulle part. Lorsque le sionisme est apparu au 19ème siècle, en tant que complément du colonialisme européen, personne ne parlait en code. Tout le monde comprit que le projet visait une colonie qui servirait de garnison aux intérêts occidentaux. Ce serait, comme Theodor Herzl l'a dit,

«un secteur du mur de l'Europe contre l'Asie, nous servirons d'avant-poste de civilisation contre la barbarie».

 

Le mur de Herzl est debout aujourd'hui. Il a été érigé en nettoyant ethniquement la majeure partie de la population palestinienne, en créant un grand nombre de réfugiés et en instaurant un régime d'apartheid pour ceux qui ne pouvaient pas être enlevés.

 

La nature et le rôle de l’État d’Israël sont tels que nous ne pouvons pas nous contenter de critiquer ses excès et ses pires aspects. Le septième des «exemples contemporains d'antisémitisme»( https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/working-definition-antisemitism) énumérés dans la définition de l'IHRA parle de «priver le peuple juif de son droit à l'autodétermination, par exemple en affirmant que l'existence d'un État d'Israël est une entreprise raciste». La dépossession des Palestiniens ne peut pas être considérée comme l'exercice d'un droit à l'autodétermination, et Israël, un État colonisateur, est une entreprise fondamentalement raciste. Le sionisme n'est pas une religion ou une ethnie, mais une idéologie politique et ses propositions sont contestées ou rejetées par de nombreux juifs, alors qu'elles sont soutenues par les dirigeants des puissances occidentales qui, pour la plupart, ne sont pas juifs.

 

Adapté de:https://www.counterfire.org/news/20414-canada-joins-campaign-to-stifle-criticism-of-israel

Distribué par PAJU (Palestiniens et Juifs Unis)

HTTPS://PAJUMONTREAL.ORG.FR

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PAJU1" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to paju1+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/paju1/be5fb8529c2fa.5d3619ce%40videotron.ca.
Partager cet article
Repost0
23 juillet 2019 2 23 /07 /juillet /2019 14:33
 

When you plant a seed, you never know what might grow.

That’s the thinking behind an initiative from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth to get the World Trade Center evidence — along with the organization’s draft legislation for a new investigation, known as the Bobby McIlvaine Act — into the hands of 2020 presidential candidates on the campaign trail.

The idea was proposed by AE911Truth volunteer John O’Malley on a March installment of Andy Steele’s weekly podcast, 9/11 Free Fall. “What can we do to make 9/11 truth an issue in the 2020 election?” O’Malley asked.

The idea of approaching candidates appealed immediately to Steele, who is AE911Truth’s volunteer co-ordinator. Fortunately, volunteer Jack Bucklin from Iowa was prepared to run with the idea, so to speak. Bucklin is a 69-year-old Vietnam veteran who worked for a non-governmental organization in Guatemala for 15 years and also spent a dozen years with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

On 9/11, he had a temporary position with the National Parks Service in Iowa and was out in the field when the Twin Towers were struck, only learning about what had happened from his supervisor that afternoon. He said he thinks that not seeing the towers come down live has allowed him to be a bit more objective than many who experienced the trauma of the event as it was happening.

It wasn’t until 2017, when Bucklin was back in Guatemala, that he came across a YouTube video about the destruction of Building 7. This new information dramatically changed his view of the event and set him on a new course to raise awareness about 9/11 as a volunteer for AE911Truth.

“It was a shock to me, just seeing the video of the Building 7 collapse,” he recalled. “It affected me fairly profoundly. I wasn’t really sleeping very good for a couple of weeks after that [because of] the ramifications of the building being brought down by controlled detonations.”

In the few weeks since Bucklin agreed to reach out to the candidates, he has achieved some truly remarkable results. As he explained when he was the July 11th guest on 9/11 Free Fall, he has so far spoken to 17 presidential candidates, two senatorial candidates, a congresswoman, and the spouse of a candidate. (He met Jill Biden, wife of former U.S. vice president Joe Biden, at a sparsely attended event in Boone, Iowa. She said she did not know about AE911Truth or the Bobby McIlvaine Act, but she accepted the material before telling Bucklin: “Keep fighting.”)

 Jack Bucklin with Jill Biden, wife of former U.S. vice president Joe Biden, after speaking with her about the Bobby McIlvaine Act.

Bucklin said he finds that candidates respond well to a respectful approach, so he starts by using their formal title and adding, “It’s an honor to meet you.” This, he says, gets their attention and helps break the ice.

“When you say that, they open up right away.”

Bucklin pointed out on 9/11 Free Fall that it is important to reach out to candidates early in the campaign process, when they are more accessible. Later, when primary season gets fully underway, they have tighter schedules and tighter security.

Here are some of the candidates Bucklin has approached in Iowa and how the interactions went:

Joe Biden: After his 9/11 Free Fall interview, Bucklin was able to speak with former U.S. vice president Joe Biden, who at first thought he was being told about the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act. Once the actual subject of Bucklin’s approach was made clear to Biden, he took Bucklin's phone number and an aide accepted the package.

Kirsten Gillibrand: The reaction from the New York senator was both dramatic and surprising. At an event attended by about 70 people in Fort Dodge, she accepted Bucklin’s material and said she had heard “there were problems with explosions.” According to Bucklin, he met her again at a subsequent event, and this time she told him that she has spoken to first responders and the families of 9/11 victims and that she thinks a new investigation into 9/11 is needed.


[Gillibrand] told him that she has spoken to first responders and the families of 9/11 victims and that she thinks a new investigation into 9/11 is needed.


Tim Ryan: At a coffee shop in the small town of Carroll — with just six in attendance and another eight journalists — Bucklin asked the Ohio congressman if he would support the Bobby McIlvaine Act. Ryan said he hadn’t heard of it, but he took the material. A young journalist congratulated Bucklin on bringing the subject up. At a later, much larger event, Ryan spotted Bucklin again and made a point of walking up to him and shaking his hand.

Amy Klobuchar: Bucklin approached the Minnesota senator at an event at a coffee shop in Boone attended by 60-70 people. Klobuchar took the package and said: “Thank you for the work you’re doing.” Bucklin met her a second time at the Ankeny Summerfest, and she remembered him, although she hadn’t been able to read the material or look at AE911Truth’s website yet.

John Hickenlooper: Bucklin approached the governor of Colorado at an event in Boone, and Hickenlooper said he would have some down time in the next couple of days and would read the information then. When Bucklin saw him again, also in Ankeny, the candidate had not yet looked at the material.

Cory Booker: At the New Jersey Senator’s Iowa headquarters in Des Moines, Bucklin was not able to speak to the candidate but did get a package to one of his aides. Bucklin made a second attempt in Boone and that time was successful. Even more encouraging was the fact that the same aide recognized Bucklin and gave him a thumbs up.

Bill de Blasio: The New York City mayor claimed he didn’t know about AE911Truth or the Bobby McIlvaine Act, but he handed the package to his aide and told Bucklin he would have her review it. Bucklin also met de Blasio’s son, Dante, who said he, too, would read the package. In Ankeny, Bucklin encountered the mayor again, and this time de Blasio told him he wanted to talk to him as soon as he was finished speaking with the press. About an hour later, the two were talking again, with de Blasio showing considerable interest in the material and instructing an aide to review it.

“He was great with me and truly intrigued,” Bucklin says.

Marianne Williamson: The New York author and activist provided what was probably the most encouraging encounter reported by Bucklin. He met her in Cedar Rapids at an event attended by about 1,500 people. Although it was much larger than the other events he’d attended, Bucklin was still able to approach Williamson, who was seated at a table nearby. She said she knew AE911Truth and that she had even seen some of their videos. She added that she and her boyfriend had been very upset by the information contained in the videos, particularly about Building 7.

“Sometimes in her stump speech she talks about it being a fight between good and evil, and evil has got control of the United States,” Bucklin explained. “She doesn’t come out and say anything about 9/11, but she has a pretty good idea of what’s going on.

“She knows what we’re talking about. She’s a believer.”


[Williamson] said she knew AE911Truth and that she had even seen some of their videos. She added that she and her boyfriend had been very upset by the information contained in the videos, particularly about Building 7.


Pete Buttigieg: In an event attended by about 100 people in Des Moines, Bucklin lined up to meet Buttigieg, who is mayor of South Bend, Indiana. He handed him the information package, which the candidate promised to read.

Bucklin also met candidates Michael Bennet, John Delaney, Joe Sestak, Seth Moulton, and Julian Castro as well as Iowa Congresswoman Abby Finkenauer and Iowa Senate candidates Kimberly Graham and Eddie Mauro.

During his radio interview with Bucklin, Steele made the point that there is no obligation for any of the presidential candidates to offer anything more than superficial politeness but several did seem to go well beyond that. Bucklin agrees and says he was also encouraged by the reaction he got from some of the young campaign workers he met.

“They’re in their early 20s, and they’re more receptive. They’re on social media more and they’ve probably heard more about it. Old folks like me get really upset.”

While Bucklin says that approaching candidates is a simple enough thing to do, he admits it doesn't come easily to him.

“It takes a certain amount of strength — spiritual strength — to do this, and I have to work it up to go and do this stuff. It’s not easy for me. But sometimes when I get done doing it, I feel a satisfaction, like I’m doing something important.

“I mean, every time, it’s speaking truth to power. And it should be done.”

Anyone who is interested in participating in this initiative can write to us at primary@ae911truth.org. Those who prefer to proceed on their own can download the material directly from the AE911Truth website. To download the Bobby McIlvaine Act and supplemental materials, go to ae911truth.org/justice.


Craig McKee is a member of the AE911Truth writing team and the creator of the blog Truth and Shadows.

 
Partager cet article
Repost0
18 juillet 2019 4 18 /07 /juillet /2019 18:09

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeNk27ahtdk

DemocracyNow

Top U.S. & World Headlines — July 17, 2019

Democracy Now!

Democracy Now! is an independent global news hour that airs on nearly 1,400 TV and radio stations Monday through Friday. Watch our livestream 8-9AM ET: https://democracynow.org

Please consider supporting independent media by making a donation to Democracy Now! today: https://democracynow.org/donate

FOLLOW DEMOCRACY NOW! ONLINE:

YouTube: http://youtube.com/democracynow

Facebook: http://facebook.com/democracynow

Twitter: https://twitter.com/democracynow

Instagram: http://instagram.com/democracynow

SoundCloud: http://soundcloud.com/democracynow

iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/podcast/demo...

Daily Email Digest: https://democracynow.org/subscribe

Partager cet article
Repost0
18 juillet 2019 4 18 /07 /juillet /2019 17:51
Don't let Vancouver equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism!
Partager cet article
Repost0
18 juillet 2019 4 18 /07 /juillet /2019 17:27
Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : Le blog de Antonio Artuso - Reconstruction communiste Canada
  • : But : Reconstruction d'un et d'un seul parti communiste au Canada, dans chaque pays et d'un et d'un seul Mouvement communiste international. À l'étape actuelle, la formation théorique-idéologique sur la doctrine de Marx et d'Engels, et de Lénine et de Staline est essentielle - (1) élaboration d'un programme d'études: (2) formation de cercles d'études marxistes-léninistes
  • Contact

Vidéo sur le 11 septembre 2001

Recherche

Hymne de l'U.R.S.S.

Images historiques

    Staline - imagesCAZWBVDE

                                                                                                                                                                                          Staline n'a pas quitté Moscou encerclée par les troupes nazies